Pears v. Ramsey

Michigan Supreme Court

Pears v. Ramsey

739 N.W.2d 84, 480 Mich. 901

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 3, 2007·No. 134211·Published

Opinion

739 N.W.2d 84 (2007)

Diane PEARS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Percy RAMSEY, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 134211. COA No. 271820.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 3, 2007.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the May 8, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

739 N.W.2d 84 (2007)

Diane PEARS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Percy RAMSEY, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 134211. COA No. 271820.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 3, 2007.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the May 8, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Pears v. Ramsey, 739 N.W.2d 84, 480 Mich. 901 (Mich. 2007).

Pincite

739 N.W.2d 84 (Pears v. Ramsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Diane PEARS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Percy RAMSEY, Defendant-Appellant.

Diane PEARS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Percy RAMSEY, Defendant-Appellant.