Pearlstein v. Barf

271 A.D.2d 834

This text of 271 A.D.2d 834 (Pearlstein v. Barf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pearlstein v. Barf, 271 A.D.2d 834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Opinion

Motion denied without costs. Present — Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ. On the court’s motion the opinion of this court handed down on June 24, 1946 (270 App. Div. 1043), is hereby amended, without prejudice to any of the proceedings thereafter had, to read as follows: “ Defendants appeal from an interlocutory judgment impressing a trust on certain real property and granting other incidental relief. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs. The finding that the property in question was an asset of the partnership has no support in the evidence, and we find that said property was not an asset of the partnership. Appeal from decision dismissed. Appeal by defendants Garvin and Claridge Food Products Corp. from an order denying their motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, dismissed, without costs. In view of the determination of the appeal from the interlocutory judgment, the appeal from the.order is academic.” The order herein is resettled in accordance with the foregoing opinion. Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 A.D.2d 834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearlstein-v-barf-nyappdiv-1946.