Pearlson v. Javitz
This text of 12 A.D.2d 791 (Pearlson v. Javitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to impress a trust upon real property and bank accounts, and for an accounting, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 13, 1960, granting plaintiff’s motion, pursuant to rule 122 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to direct defendant to appear for examination for the purpose of enabling plaintiffs to frame their second amended complaint. [792]*792Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. The examination of defendant shall proceed on 10 days’ written notice or any other date mutually fixed by the parties. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 A.D.2d 791, 211 N.Y.S.2d 700, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearlson-v-javitz-nyappdiv-1961.