Pearlman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

261 A.D. 947, 27 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8240

This text of 261 A.D. 947 (Pearlman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pearlman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 261 A.D. 947, 27 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8240 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied. (See Miller v. Union Indemnity Co., 209 App. Div. 455; 211 id. 840; affd., 240 N. Y. 627.) Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Untermyer, J., concurs in result. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Union Indemnity Company
148 N.E. 734 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)
Miller v. Union Indemnity Co.
209 A.D. 455 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D. 947, 27 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearlman-v-new-amsterdam-casualty-co-nyappdiv-1941.