Pearlman v. J. Cheney Mason, P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pearlman v. J. Cheney Mason, P.A.

946 So. 2d 123, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 491, 2007 WL 120138

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 16, 2007·No. No. 5D07-25·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find that the Petitioner’s verified Motion for Disqualification of the trial judge was legally sufficient. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(d). Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of prohibition and quash the trial court’s order denying Petitioner’s motion. We withhold issuing the writ, as we assume that the trial court will act in conformance with this opinion.

PETITION GRANTED.

ORFINGER, MONACO, and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find that the Petitioner’s verified Motion for Disqualification of the trial judge was legally sufficient. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(d). Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of prohibition and quash the trial court’s order denying Petitioner’s motion. We withhold issuing the writ, as we assume that the trial court will act in conformance with this opinion.

PETITION GRANTED.

ORFINGER, MONACO, and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Pearlman v. J. Cheney Mason, P.A., 946 So. 2d 123, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 491, 2007 WL 120138 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

946 So. 2d 123 (Pearlman v. J. Cheney Mason, P.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.