Pearlman v. Borgia

275 So. 3d 1282
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 2019·No. No. 1D19-1563·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*1283Upon consideration of Appellant's response to the Court's order of June 19, 2019, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not final and the appeal is premature because the order merely grants a motion and does not contain the requisite words of finality to make it an order entering a final appealable judgment. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(l ) ; Hickox v. Taylor , 933 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant's request for clarification is denied.

Lewis, Kelsey, and Winokur, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pearlman v. Borgia, 275 So. 3d 1282 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

275 So. 3d 1282 (Pearlman v. Borgia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hickox v. Taylor
933 So. 2d 675 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)