Pearlman v. Borgia

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pearlman v. Borgia

275 So. 3d 1282

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 29, 2019

DocketNo. 1D19-1563

StatusPublished

This text of 275 So. 3d 1282 (Pearlman v. Borgia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pearlman v. Borgia, 275 So. 3d 1282 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*1283Upon consideration of Appellant's response to the Court's order of June 19, 2019, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not final and the appeal is premature because the order merely grants a motion and does not contain the requisite words of finality to make it an order entering a final appealable judgment. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(l ) ; Hickox v. Taylor , 933 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant's request for clarification is denied.

Lewis, Kelsey, and Winokur, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

*1283Upon consideration of Appellant's response to the Court's order of June 19, 2019, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not final and the appeal is premature because the order merely grants a motion and does not contain the requisite words of finality to make it an order entering a final appealable judgment. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(l ) ; Hickox v. Taylor , 933 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant's request for clarification is denied.

Lewis, Kelsey, and Winokur, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 So. 3d 1282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearlman-v-borgia-fladistctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack