PEARLINE WILLIAMS v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
PEARLINE WILLIAMS,
Appellant,
v.
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.,
Appellee.
No. 4D19-1325
[May 21, 2020]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barry Stone, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE-17- 010399.
James Jean-Francois of Law Offices of James Jean-Francois, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.
Lindsay R. Rich of First American Law Group, Tampa, for appellee. PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.1 LEVINE, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1 We are mindful of the issuance of Administrative Order SC20-23 (the
requirement in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.580(a) for the clerk to issue a writ of possession “forthwith” remains suspended) and Executive Order 20-121 (extending, until 12:01 a.m. on June 2, 2020, Executive Order 20-94, which suspends and tolls any statute providing for a mortgage foreclosure cause of action under Florida law). We trust any motions directed to those orders shall be filed in the lower tribunal upon issuance of our mandate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
PEARLINE WILLIAMS v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC. (PEARLINE WILLIAMS v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.