Pearline Davis v. M&T Bank
This text of Pearline Davis v. M&T Bank (Pearline Davis v. M&T Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 30, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
158119 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra PEARLINE DAVIS, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 158119 COA: 338705 Wayne CC: 17-002555-CH M & T BANK, Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 7, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 30, 2019 t0422 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pearline Davis v. M&T Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearline-davis-v-mt-bank-mich-2019.