Pearlette Fashions, Inc. v. Perlette Fashions, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pearlette Fashions, Inc. v. Perlette Fashions, Inc.

76 A.D.2d 780, 429 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11821

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 12, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 76 A.D.2d 780 (Pearlette Fashions, Inc. v. Perlette Fashions, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pearlette Fashions, Inc. v. Perlette Fashions, Inc., 76 A.D.2d 780, 429 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11821 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 7, 1979, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as against the individual defendant, Samuel Sachs, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of dismissing the complaint against defendant Samuel Sachs and, otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. There are no specific allegations of any wrongdoing against defendant Samuel Sachs, individually. Therefore, the complaint as against him should have been dismissed. Concur—Birns, J. P., Sandler, Ross, Markewich and Bloom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 7, 1979, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as against the individual defendant, Samuel Sachs, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of dismissing the complaint against defendant Samuel Sachs and, otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. There are no specific allegations of any wrongdoing against defendant Samuel Sachs, individually. Therefore, the complaint as against him should have been dismissed. Concur—Birns, J. P., Sandler, Ross, Markewich and Bloom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 A.D.2d 780, 429 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearlette-fashions-inc-v-perlette-fashions-inc-nyappdiv-1980.