Pearl-Wick Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank

New York Court of Appeals

Pearl-Wick Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank

522 N.E.2d 1054, 71 N.Y.2d 823, 527 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 217

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 17, 1988

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 522 N.E.2d 1054 (Pearl-Wick Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pearl-Wick Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 522 N.E.2d 1054, 71 N.Y.2d 823, 527 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 217 (N.Y. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs. For the reasons stated in the Appellate Division memorandum (125 AD2d 249), the first, second and fourth causes of action were barred by the Statute of Limitations, and the third cause of action was properly dismissed for failure to state a valid basis for relief.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Dillon.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs. For the reasons stated in the Appellate Division memorandum (125 AD2d 249), the first, second and fourth causes of action were barred by the Statute of Limitations, and the third cause of action was properly dismissed for failure to state a valid basis for relief.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Dillon.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

522 N.E.2d 1054, 71 N.Y.2d 823, 527 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearl-wick-corp-v-chase-manhattan-bank-ny-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack