Pearl-Wick Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank
522 N.E.2d 1054, 71 N.Y.2d 823, 527 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 217
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. For the reasons stated in the Appellate Division memorandum (125 AD2d 249), the first, second and fourth causes of action were barred by the Statute of Limitations, and the third cause of action was properly dismissed for failure to state a valid basis for relief.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Dillon.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pearl-Wick Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 522 N.E.2d 1054, 71 N.Y.2d 823, 527 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 217 (N.Y. 1988).
522 N.E.2d 1054 (Pearl-Wick Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Medallion Fin. Corp. v. Rucker
2024 NY Slip Op 00167 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)