Pearl v. Pearl

489 So. 2d 109, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1124, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7786
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 14, 1986
DocketNo. 85-2367
StatusPublished

This text of 489 So. 2d 109 (Pearl v. Pearl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pearl v. Pearl, 489 So. 2d 109, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1124, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7786 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The pleadings and evidence presented furnish a sufficient basis to sustain the trial court’s award of lump sum alimony. We find no abuse of discretion and accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
489 So. 2d 109, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1124, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearl-v-pearl-fladistctapp-1986.