Pearl v. Department of Rev., Tc-Md 100053d (or.tax 4-6-2010)

Oregon Tax Court

Pearl v. Department of Rev., Tc-Md 100053d (or.tax 4-6-2010)

DecidedApril 6, 2010

DocketTC-MD 100053D.

StatusPublished

This text of Pearl v. Department of Rev., Tc-Md 100053d (or.tax 4-6-2010) (Pearl v. Department of Rev., Tc-Md 100053d (or.tax 4-6-2010)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pearl v. Department of Rev., Tc-Md 100053d (or.tax 4-6-2010), (Or. Super. Ct. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on the ground that Plaintiff failed to appeal within the 90 days required by ORS 305.280(2).¹

A review of Plaintiff's materials shows the Notice of Deficiency Assessment was mailed to Plaintiff on October 21, 2009. The Complaint was filed on February 3, 2010. This interval is longer than the 90 days required by ORS 305.280(2), which provides:

"An appeal under ORS 323.416 or 323.623 or from any notice of assessment or refund denial issued by the Department of Revenue with respect to a tax imposed under ORS chapter 118, 308, 308A, 310, 314, 316, 317, 318, 321 or this chapter, or collected pursuant to ORS 305.620, shall be filed within 90 days after the date of the notice. An appeal from a proposed adjustment under ORS 305.270 shall be filed within 90 days after the date the notice of adjustment is final."

The court is not aware of any circumstances that extend the statutory limit of 90 days. Defendant's motion is granted. Now, therefore, *Page 2

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is allowed. The Complaint is dismissed.

Dated this ___ day of April 2010.

If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the RegularDivision of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street,Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 StateStreet, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of theDecision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed. This Decision was signed by Presiding Magistrate Jill A. Tanner onApril 6, 2010. The court filed and entered this Decision on April 6,2010.

¹ All references to the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) are to the 2009 edition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on the ground that Plaintiff failed to appeal within the 90 days required by ORS 305.280(2).¹

A review of Plaintiff's materials shows the Notice of Deficiency Assessment was mailed to Plaintiff on October 21, 2009. The Complaint was filed on February 3, 2010. This interval is longer than the 90 days required by ORS 305.280(2), which provides:

"An appeal under ORS 323.416 or 323.623 or from any notice of assessment or refund denial issued by the Department of Revenue with respect to a tax imposed under ORS chapter 118, 308, 308A, 310, 314, 316, 317, 318, 321 or this chapter, or collected pursuant to ORS 305.620, shall be filed within 90 days after the date of the notice. An appeal from a proposed adjustment under ORS 305.270 shall be filed within 90 days after the date the notice of adjustment is final."

The court is not aware of any circumstances that extend the statutory limit of 90 days. Defendant's motion is granted. Now, therefore, *Page 2

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is allowed. The Complaint is dismissed.

Dated this ___ day of April 2010.

If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the RegularDivision of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street,Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 StateStreet, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of theDecision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed. This Decision was signed by Presiding Magistrate Jill A. Tanner onApril 6, 2010. The court filed and entered this Decision on April 6,2010.

¹ All references to the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) are to the 2009 edition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Pearl v. Department of Rev., Tc-Md 100053d (or.tax 4-6-2010), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearl-v-department-of-rev-tc-md-100053d-ortax-4-6-2010-ortc-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack