Pearl v. David & Dash, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Pearl v. David & Dash, Inc.

179 So. 2d 347

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedOctober 29, 1965

DocketNo. 34430

StatusPublished

This text of 179 So. 2d 347 (Pearl v. David & Dash, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pearl v. David & Dash, Inc., 179 So. 2d 347 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks to have this court review by writ of certiorari an order of the Full Commission ruling on an interlocutory order of the deputy commissioner. In accordance with our recent decision in Direct Oil Corporation v. Brown, 178 So.2d 13 (Fla.1965) the writ is denied.

It is further ordered that the petitioner’s motion for allowance of attorney’s fees, be and the same is hereby denied.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. THORNAL, C. J., concurs in judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks to have this court review by writ of certiorari an order of the Full Commission ruling on an interlocutory order of the deputy commissioner. In accordance with our recent decision in Direct Oil Corporation v. Brown, 178 So.2d 13 (Fla.1965) the writ is denied.

It is further ordered that the petitioner’s motion for allowance of attorney’s fees, be and the same is hereby denied.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. THORNAL, C. J., concurs in judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 So. 2d 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearl-v-david-dash-inc-fla-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack