Pearl River Tung Co. v. Reyer

83 So. 2d 103, 225 Miss. 252, 1955 Miss. LEXIS 578
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 7, 1955
DocketNo. 39769
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 83 So. 2d 103 (Pearl River Tung Co. v. Reyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pearl River Tung Co. v. Reyer, 83 So. 2d 103, 225 Miss. 252, 1955 Miss. LEXIS 578 (Mich. 1955).

Opinion

Hall, J.

This is the second appearance of this case in this Court. On December 7, 1953, we entered judgment in favor of appellee for compensation payments at the rate of $10.00 per week from January 24, 1950, to July 25, [254]*2541951, and remanded the case to the Workmens’ Compensation Commission for determination as to her disability thereafter. Reyer v. Pearl River Tung Company, et al., 219 Miss. 211, 68 So. 2d 442. A hearing was had after remand and the attorney-referee found on August 6, 1954, that the claimant reached her maximum degree of recovery on July 25, 1951, and thereafter has been permanently partially disabled, and the awarded compensation at the rate of $4.87 per week between the two dates last named. From that award the employer and its insurance carrier appealed to the full commission which affirmed the award of the attorney-referee, and it was likewise affirmed on appeal to the circuit court. Hence the appeal here.

The sole contention of appellants is that the evidence is insufficient to support the award. We do not think so. The hearing officer was justified in finding that the claimant is still suffering as a result of her injury and that, while her condition has improved since the first hearing, she is still unable to do the work that she formerly did, and her former earning capacity has been reduced materially. Consequently the judgment of the lower court will he affirmed and the cause remanded to the commission for determination as to any compensation which may become due from and after August 6, 1954.

Affirmed and remanded.

Boberds, P. J., and Holmes, Arrington and Ethridge, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wiygul Motor Co. v. Pate
115 So. 2d 51 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 So. 2d 103, 225 Miss. 252, 1955 Miss. LEXIS 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearl-river-tung-co-v-reyer-miss-1955.