Pearl Johnson v. Earl Watkins

Fifth Circuit

Pearl Johnson v. Earl Watkins

472 F. App'x 330

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJuly 12, 2012

Docket11-60261

StatusUnpublished

This text of 472 F. App'x 330 (Pearl Johnson v. Earl Watkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pearl Johnson v. Earl Watkins, 472 F. App'x 330 (5th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

After having reviewed the pertinent portions of the record and studied the briefs, we affirm the judgment of the district court granting Appellees’ motion for judgment as a matter of law for essentially the reasons given by the district court in its opinion. See Johnson v. Watkins, 803 F.Supp.2d 561 (S.D.Miss.2011).

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

After having reviewed the pertinent portions of the record and studied the briefs, we affirm the judgment of the district court granting Appellees’ motion for judgment as a matter of law for essentially the reasons given by the district court in its opinion. See Johnson v. Watkins, 803 F.Supp.2d 561 (S.D.Miss.2011).

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

472 F. App'x 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearl-johnson-v-earl-watkins-ca5-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack