Pearl Johnson v. Earl Watkins

Fifth Circuit

Pearl Johnson v. Earl Watkins

472 F. App'x 330

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 12, 2012·No. 11-60261·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

After having reviewed the pertinent portions of the record and studied the briefs, we affirm the judgment of the district court granting Appellees’ motion for judgment as a matter of law for essentially the reasons given by the district court in its opinion. See Johnson v. Watkins, 803 F.Supp.2d 561 (S.D.Miss.2011).

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

After having reviewed the pertinent portions of the record and studied the briefs, we affirm the judgment of the district court granting Appellees’ motion for judgment as a matter of law for essentially the reasons given by the district court in its opinion. See Johnson v. Watkins, 803 F.Supp.2d 561 (S.D.Miss.2011).

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Pearl Johnson v. Earl Watkins, 472 F. App'x 330 (5th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

472 F. App'x 330 (Pearl Johnson v. Earl Watkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related