Pearl E. Dilley, Administratrix of the Estate of Glen D. Dilley, Deceased v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a Corporation

Sixth Circuit

Pearl E. Dilley, Administratrix of the Estate of Glen D. Dilley, Deceased v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a Corporation

276 F.2d 604, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4903

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 9, 1960

Docket14049

StatusPublished

This text of 276 F.2d 604 (Pearl E. Dilley, Administratrix of the Estate of Glen D. Dilley, Deceased v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pearl E. Dilley, Administratrix of the Estate of Glen D. Dilley, Deceased v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a Corporation, 276 F.2d 604, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4903 (6th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This day this cause came on to be heard: and was submitted to the Court upon the record and the briefs and oral arguments of counsel.

On consideration whereof, the Court finds that the jury reported and the foreman stated, in response to a question of the Trial Judge, that the jury had arrived at a verdict; that a purported written verdict signed by all of the members of the jury was submitted to the court; that upon further inquiry of the Trial Judge, the foreman said that the verdict was not his verdict; that thereupon the Trial Judge refused to accept the verdict.

The Court further finds that as a result of the foregoing there was not a unanimous agreement of the jurors on a verdict; that the trial resulted in a disagreement of the jurors, with no valid verdict returned; and that the judgment of the trial court in overruling the appellant’s motion for final judgment on the verdict should be affirmed.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the trial court be and it is hereby affirmed and that the case be remanded to the trial court for trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This day this cause came on to be heard: and was submitted to the Court upon the record and the briefs and oral arguments of counsel.

On consideration whereof, the Court finds that the jury reported and the foreman stated, in response to a question of the Trial Judge, that the jury had arrived at a verdict; that a purported written verdict signed by all of the members of the jury was submitted to the court; that upon further inquiry of the Trial Judge, the foreman said that the verdict was not his verdict; that thereupon the Trial Judge refused to accept the verdict.

The Court further finds that as a result of the foregoing there was not a unanimous agreement of the jurors on a verdict; that the trial resulted in a disagreement of the jurors, with no valid verdict returned; and that the judgment of the trial court in overruling the appellant’s motion for final judgment on the verdict should be affirmed.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the trial court be and it is hereby affirmed and that the case be remanded to the trial court for trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 F.2d 604, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearl-e-dilley-administratrix-of-the-estate-of-glen-d-dilley-deceased-ca6-1960.