Pearce & Williams v. Borg Chewing-Gum Co.
This text of 36 S.E. 457 (Pearce & Williams v. Borg Chewing-Gum Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where the purchaser of goods seeks to avoid the contract of purchase on the ground of fraud, he must, upon the discovery of the facts constituting the fraud, upon his first opportunity to do so, announce his purpose to rescind. If he remain silent and retain possession of the goods received under the contract, without complaint, until long after the discovery of the facts, he will be held to have waived the objection and will be bound by the contract as though there had been no fraud. Smith v. Esley Organ Co., 100 Ga. 628, and cases cited. This is especially true where the purchaser endeavors to rescind the contract in part only. Maynard v. Render, 95 Ga. 652.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 S.E. 457, 111 Ga. 847, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearce-williams-v-borg-chewing-gum-co-ga-1900.