Pearce v. Sutherland
This text of 3 Alaska 302 (Pearce v. Sutherland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Alaska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A party to a suit and a witness, who voluntarily and in good faith comes into Alaska from New York to attend trial in the district court, cannot, while in attendance, be served with summons in new civil litigation in this court. Such service will be quashed on motion. Parker v. Hotchkiss, 1 Wall. Jr. 269, Fed. Cas. No. 10,739; Brooks v. Farwell (C. C.) 4 Fed. 166; Larned v. Griffin (C. C.) 12 Fed. 590; Wilson-Sewing-Machine Co. v. Wilson (C. C.) 22 Fed. 803; Small v. Montgomery (C. C.) 23 Fed. 707; Kauffman v. Kennedy (C. C.) 25 Fed. 785; Kinne v. Lant (C. C.) 68 Fed. 436; Hale v. Wharton (C. C.) 73 Fed. 739; Morrow v. Dudley (D. C.) 144 Fed. 441; Skinner v. Waite (C. C.) 155 Fed. 828.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Alaska 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearce-v-sutherland-akd-1907.