Pearce v. Sutherland

D. Alaska

Pearce v. Sutherland

3 Alaska 302

District Court, D. Alaska·Decided May 7, 1907·No. No. 615A·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WICKERSHAM, District Judge.

A party to a suit and a witness, who voluntarily and in good faith comes into Alaska from New York to attend trial in the district court, cannot, while in attendance, be served with summons in new civil litigation in this court. Such service will be quashed on motion. Parker v. Hotchkiss, 1 Wall. Jr. 269, Fed. Cas. No. 10,739; Brooks v. Farwell (C. C.) 4 Fed. 166; Larned v. Griffin (C. C.) 12 Fed. 590; Wilson-Sewing-Machine Co. v. Wilson (C. C.) 22 Fed. 803; Small v. Montgomery (C. C.) 23 Fed. 707; Kauffman v. Kennedy (C. C.) 25 Fed. 785; Kinne v. Lant (C. C.) 68 Fed. 436; Hale v. Wharton (C. C.) 73 Fed. 739; Morrow v. Dudley (D. C.) 144 Fed. 441; Skinner v. Waite (C. C.) 155 Fed. 828.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WICKERSHAM, District Judge.

A party to a suit and a witness, who voluntarily and in good faith comes into Alaska from New York to attend trial in the district court, cannot, while in attendance, be served with summons in new civil litigation in this court. Such service will be quashed on motion. Parker v. Hotchkiss, 1 Wall. Jr. 269, Fed. Cas. No. 10,739; Brooks v. Farwell (C. C.) 4 Fed. 166; Larned v. Griffin (C. C.) 12 Fed. 590; Wilson-Sewing-Machine Co. v. Wilson (C. C.) 22 Fed. 803; Small v. Montgomery (C. C.) 23 Fed. 707; Kauffman v. Kennedy (C. C.) 25 Fed. 785; Kinne v. Lant (C. C.) 68 Fed. 436; Hale v. Wharton (C. C.) 73 Fed. 739; Morrow v. Dudley (D. C.) 144 Fed. 441; Skinner v. Waite (C. C.) 155 Fed. 828.

Pearce v. Sutherland, 3 Alaska 302 (D. Alaska 1907).

Pincite

3 Alaska 302 (Pearce v. Sutherland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related