Pearce v. State
538 So. 2d 54, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 138, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 40, 1989 WL 189
Opinion
We recognize that the conviction of a codefendant was vacated;1 however, there are distinguishing facts presented in this case. Accordingly, we affirm Pearce’s convictions for trafficking in cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pearce v. State, 538 So. 2d 54, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 138, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 40, 1989 WL 189 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
538 So. 2d 54 (Pearce v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Elias v. State
526 So. 2d 1014 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)