Pearce v. State

538 So. 2d 54, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 138, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 40, 1989 WL 189
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 6, 1989·No. No. 87-2533·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We recognize that the conviction of a codefendant was vacated;1 however, there are distinguishing facts presented in this case. Accordingly, we affirm Pearce’s convictions for trafficking in cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia.

AFFIRMED.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pearce v. State, 538 So. 2d 54, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 138, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 40, 1989 WL 189 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

538 So. 2d 54 (Pearce v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elias v. State
526 So. 2d 1014 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)