Pearce v. State

114 So. 924, 22 Ala. App. 686
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 7, 1927
Docket6 Div. 144.
StatusPublished

This text of 114 So. 924 (Pearce v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pearce v. State, 114 So. 924, 22 Ala. App. 686 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This prosecution, for the violation of the prohibition law, originated in the county court of Tuscaloosa county. Prom a judgment of conviction in said court the defendant appealed to the circuit court, and was there tried by a jury upon a complaint filed by the solicitor for the same offense. In the circuit court he was again convicted, and duly sentenced to hard labor for the county. Prom the judgment of conviction, pronounced and entered, this appeal was taken. The appeal hei-e is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. An examination of the record fails to disclose any error; therefore the judgment of conviction upon which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 So. 924, 22 Ala. App. 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearce-v-state-alactapp-1927.