Pearce v. Publix Supermarkets

675 So. 2d 710, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6772, 1996 WL 347129
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 1996·No. No. 95-1921·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary judgment entered in this slip and fall action where the record discloses a genuine triable issue of a material fact as to whether the alleged dangerous condition existed for a sufficient length of time so as to place the appellee on constructive notice thereof in exercise of ordinary care or that the condition occurred with sufficient regularity so as to be foreseeable. Montgomery v. Florida Jitney Jungle Stores, Inc., 281 So.2d 302, 303 (Fla.1973); Dale v. ITT Sheraton Corp., 611 So.2d 594 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Brooks v. Phillip Watts Enters., Inc., 560 So.2d 339 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 567 So.2d 435 (Fla.1990); Nance v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 436 So.2d 1075 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), rev. denied, 447 So.2d 889 (Fla.1984).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pearce v. Publix Supermarkets, 675 So. 2d 710, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6772, 1996 WL 347129 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

675 So. 2d 710 (Pearce v. Publix Supermarkets) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Colon v. Outback Steakhouse of Florida
721 So. 2d 769 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)