Pearce v. Phillips

4 Mass. 672
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1808
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 4 Mass. 672 (Pearce v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pearce v. Phillips, 4 Mass. 672 (Mass. 1808).

Opinion

And at the succeeding March term in Suffolk, the unanimous opinion of the Court [the Chief Justice not sitting in the cause] was delivered by

Sedgwick, J.

[After stating briefly the facts in the cause.] The plaintiff’s claim of a part of the profits on the coffee which was saved is, in our opinion, contrary to the manifest intention of the contract, by which the plaintiff was entitled only, in case there should be, in fact, a profit arising upon the whole adventure ; if there should be such a loss that no profit should accrue, the plaintiff would have no right to claim any thing. In this case, therefore, there being no profit, there is nothing to which the plaintiff can form a just claim. The same principle was assumed as correct in the case of Putnam vs. Wood, which was cited at the bar by the judgment of the whole Court.

We are all of opinion that judgment must be entered according to the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peters v. Peters
62 Mass. 529 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1851)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Mass. 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearce-v-phillips-mass-1808.