Pearce v. Pearce

363 So. 2d 1146, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16535
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 3, 1978·No. No. 78-894·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the trial court modifying the final judgment of dissolution, but we reverse the award of attorney’s fees to appellee. The trial court received no evidence as to the services performed by appellee’s attorney or as to the value of those services, and so it was without authority to make an award. Nivens v. Nivens, 312 So.2d 201 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Accordingly, we remand the case for rede-termination of attorney’s fees.

GRIMES, C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pearce v. Pearce, 363 So. 2d 1146, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16535 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

363 So. 2d 1146 (Pearce v. Pearce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nolin v. Nolin
466 So. 2d 14 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Prevatt v. Prevatt
462 So. 2d 604 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Wilson v. State
363 So. 2d 1146 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)