Pearce v. McClanahan

Supreme Court of Missouri

Pearce v. McClanahan

50 Mo. 267

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedJuly 15, 1872

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 50 Mo. 267 (Pearce v. McClanahan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pearce v. McClanahan, 50 Mo. 267 (Mo. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

Adams, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action by attachment. After commencing their suit plaintiffs filed an amended.petition, and the defendant filed a motion to strike it out, which motion was sustained and a bill of exceptions filed. The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the writ of error, because there was no final judgment. The action of the Circuit Court in sustaining the motion to strike out was not a final judgment from which a writ of error lies.

The writ of error is dismissed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action by attachment. After commencing their suit plaintiffs filed an amended.petition, and the defendant filed a motion to strike it out, which motion was sustained and a bill of exceptions filed. The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the writ of error, because there was no final judgment. The action of the Circuit Court in sustaining the motion to strike out was not a final judgment from which a writ of error lies.

The writ of error is dismissed.

The other judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 Mo. 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearce-v-mcclanahan-mo-1872.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack