Pearce v. McClanahan
50 Mo. 267
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This was an action by attachment. After commencing their suit plaintiffs filed an amended.petition, and the defendant filed a motion to strike it out, which motion was sustained and a bill of exceptions filed. The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the writ of error, because there was no final judgment. The action of the Circuit Court in sustaining the motion to strike out was not a final judgment from which a writ of error lies.
The writ of error is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pearce v. McClanahan, 50 Mo. 267 (Mo. 1872).
50 Mo. 267 (Pearce v. McClanahan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morrison v. Estate of Martin
427 S.W.2d 783 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1968)
Nordquist v. the Amourdale State Bk.
19 S.W.2d 553 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1929)
Dixon v. St. Louis Transit Co.
146 S.W. 1179 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1912)
State v. Wymer
79 Mo. 277 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)