Pearce v. Flagler Memorial Park, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Pearce v. Flagler Memorial Park, Inc.

36 So. 2d 273, 160 Fla. 661, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 825

DecidedJuly 6, 1948

StatusPublished

This text of 36 So. 2d 273 (Pearce v. Flagler Memorial Park, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pearce v. Flagler Memorial Park, Inc., 36 So. 2d 273, 160 Fla. 661, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 825 (Fla. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an application for certiorari under Rule 34 of the rules of this court. It appears that petitioner filed his bill of complaint against respondent praying for an accounting and other relief. The chancellor granting a motion by respondent transferring the cause to.the law side of the docket. This appeal is by certiorari from that decree.

The record and the briefs have been examined and we are convinced that the bill and the amended bill of complaint contained equity and that relief by equity will be more complete and efficacious. This is, of course, assuming that the allega *662 tions of the amended bill of complaint are proven. It was, therefore, error to transfer the cause to the law side of the docket.

Certiorari is granted and the judgment appealed from is quashed with directions to reinstate the amended bill of complaint and proceed accordingly.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI