Pearce v. Clemons
This text of 140 S.E. 527 (Pearce v. Clemons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Clemons sued Pearce upon a series of promissory notes, and, as against the plea of the defendant, recovered judgment. The motion for a new trial, complaining that the evidence did not authorize the verdict, and that the court’s charge unduly stressed the question of the burden of proof to be carried by the defendant in order to sustain his plea, was overruled. Held, that the overruling of the motion for a new trial was not erroneous for any reason pointed out in the record.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 S.E. 527, 37 Ga. App. 331, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearce-v-clemons-gactapp-1927.