Peal Ex Rel. Peal v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Peal Ex Rel. Peal v. Smith

457 S.E.2d 599, 340 N.C. 352, 1995 N.C. LEXIS 255

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJune 2, 1995

Docket398PA94

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 457 S.E.2d 599 (Peal Ex Rel. Peal v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peal Ex Rel. Peal v. Smith, 457 S.E.2d 599, 340 N.C. 352, 1995 N.C. LEXIS 255 (N.C. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice Orr recused and took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Nesbit v. Howard, 333 N.C. 782, 429 S.E.2d 730 (1993).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Justice Orr recused and took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Nesbit v. Howard, 333 N.C. 782, 429 S.E.2d 730 (1993).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

457 S.E.2d 599, 340 N.C. 352, 1995 N.C. LEXIS 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peal-ex-rel-peal-v-smith-nc-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack