Peake v. Fuller

Michigan Supreme Court

Peake v. Fuller

82 N.W. 847, 123 Mich. 684, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 890

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedApril 24, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 82 N.W. 847 (Peake v. Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peake v. Fuller, 82 N.W. 847, 123 Mich. 684, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 890 (Mich. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The facts in this case are like the facts in Peake v. Yule, ante, 675 (82 N. W. 514), and that case is controlling of the present, except one other question is here raised. It is claimed by the defendant that the action is barred by the statute of limitations. We think [685]*685not.' That question is controlled by the case of Wardle v. Hudson, 96 Mich. 432 (55 N. W. 992). The statute did not begin to run until the time the assessment was made. See Smith v. Bell, 107 Pa. St. 352.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The facts in this case are like the facts in Peake v. Yule, ante, 675 (82 N. W. 514), and that case is controlling of the present, except one other question is here raised. It is claimed by the defendant that the action is barred by the statute of limitations. We think [685]*685not.' That question is controlled by the case of Wardle v. Hudson, 96 Mich. 432 (55 N. W. 992). The statute did not begin to run until the time the assessment was made. See Smith v. Bell, 107 Pa. St. 352.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 N.W. 847, 123 Mich. 684, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peake-v-fuller-mich-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack