Peak v. State

265 S.W. 1117, 98 Tex. Crim. 343
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 29, 1924·No. No. 8904.·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— The conviction is for theft, entered under a plea of guilty to a former indictment regularly presented.

Before this court is neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. The procedure appears regular and the conviction legal.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peak v. State, 265 S.W. 1117, 98 Tex. Crim. 343 (Tex. 1924).

265 S.W. 1117 (Peak v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.