Peak v. State ex rel. Means

Supreme Court of Kansas

Peak v. State ex rel. Means

72 P. 1100, 67 Kan. 824, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 344

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedMay 9, 1903

DocketNo. 13,119

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 72 P. 1100 (Peak v. State ex rel. Means) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peak v. State ex rel. Means, 72 P. 1100, 67 Kan. 824, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 344 (kan 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is a proceeding brought to reverse an order of the district court refusing to vacate a temporary injunction granted under the provisions of section 2463 of the General Statutes of 1901. This court has recently decided that the section referred to was repealed by implication by section 1 of chapter 282 of the Laws of 1901 (Gen. Stat. 1901, §2493). ( The State v. Estep, 66 Kan. 416, 71 Pac. 857.) Our attention has not been called to any reason why that authority does not‘require a reversal of this case, and we infer from the fact that the defendant in error has filed no brief that error is practically confessed. The order of the district court is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the views expressed in the case cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This is a proceeding brought to reverse an order of the district court refusing to vacate a temporary injunction granted under the provisions of section 2463 of the General Statutes of 1901. This court has recently decided that the section referred to was repealed by implication by section 1 of chapter 282 of the Laws of 1901 (Gen. Stat. 1901, §2493). ( The State v. Estep, 66 Kan. 416, 71 Pac. 857.) Our attention has not been called to any reason why that authority does not‘require a reversal of this case, and we infer from the fact that the defendant in error has filed no brief that error is practically confessed. The order of the district court is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the views expressed in the case cited.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 P. 1100, 67 Kan. 824, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peak-v-state-ex-rel-means-kan-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack