Peak v. State ex rel. Means

72 P. 1100, 67 Kan. 824, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 344
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided May 9, 1903·No. No. 13,119·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is a proceeding brought to reverse an order of the district court refusing to vacate a temporary injunction granted under the provisions of section 2463 of the General Statutes of 1901. This court has recently decided that the section referred to was repealed by implication by section 1 of chapter 282 of the Laws of 1901 (Gen. Stat. 1901, §2493). ( The State v. Estep, 66 Kan. 416, 71 Pac. 857.) Our attention has not been called to any reason why that authority does not‘require a reversal of this case, and we infer from the fact that the defendant in error has filed no brief that error is practically confessed. The order of the district court is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the views expressed in the case cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peak v. State ex rel. Means, 72 P. 1100, 67 Kan. 824, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 344 (kan 1903).

72 P. 1100 (Peak v. State ex rel. Means) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudd v. Wilson
1912 OK 147 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Butler v. McSpadden
1910 OK 5 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)