Peak v. State Dept. of Industrial Relations

Supreme Court of Alabama

Peak v. State Dept. of Industrial Relations

340 So. 2d 802, 1976 Ala. LEXIS 1588

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 10, 1976·No. SC 1972·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

JONES, Justice.

Writ quashed as improvidently granted. Quashing of the writ in this cause is not to be construed as agreeing with that portion of the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, 340 So.2d 796, that the facts as found by that Court constitutes a “labor dispute” as that term is used in Title 26, § 214 A, Code. See Nash v. Florida Industrial Commission, 389 U.S. 235, 88 S.Ct. 362, 19 L.Ed.2d 438 (1967).

WRIT QUASHED.

All the Justices concur, except BEATTY, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JONES, Justice.

Writ quashed as improvidently granted. Quashing of the writ in this cause is not to be construed as agreeing with that portion of the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, 340 So.2d 796, that the facts as found by that Court constitutes a “labor dispute” as that term is used in Title 26, § 214 A, Code. See Nash v. Florida Industrial Commission, 389 U.S. 235, 88 S.Ct. 362, 19 L.Ed.2d 438 (1967).

WRIT QUASHED.

All the Justices concur, except BEATTY, J., not sitting.

Peak v. State Dept. of Industrial Relations, 340 So. 2d 802, 1976 Ala. LEXIS 1588 (Ala. 1976).

Pincite

340 So. 2d 802 (Peak v. State Dept. of Industrial Relations) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related