Peak v. State Dept. of Industrial Relations

Supreme Court of Alabama

Peak v. State Dept. of Industrial Relations

340 So. 2d 802, 1976 Ala. LEXIS 1588

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedDecember 10, 1976

DocketSC 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 340 So. 2d 802 (Peak v. State Dept. of Industrial Relations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peak v. State Dept. of Industrial Relations, 340 So. 2d 802, 1976 Ala. LEXIS 1588 (Ala. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

JONES, Justice.

Writ quashed as improvidently granted. Quashing of the writ in this cause is not to be construed as agreeing with that portion of the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, 340 So.2d 796, that the facts as found by that Court constitutes a “labor dispute” as that term is used in Title 26, § 214 A, Code. See Nash v. Florida Industrial Commission, 389 U.S. 235, 88 S.Ct. 362, 19 L.Ed.2d 438 (1967).

WRIT QUASHED.

All the Justices concur, except BEATTY, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JONES, Justice.

Writ quashed as improvidently granted. Quashing of the writ in this cause is not to be construed as agreeing with that portion of the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, 340 So.2d 796, that the facts as found by that Court constitutes a “labor dispute” as that term is used in Title 26, § 214 A, Code. See Nash v. Florida Industrial Commission, 389 U.S. 235, 88 S.Ct. 362, 19 L.Ed.2d 438 (1967).

WRIT QUASHED.

All the Justices concur, except BEATTY, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

340 So. 2d 802, 1976 Ala. LEXIS 1588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peak-v-state-dept-of-industrial-relations-ala-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack