Peak v. Percifull

66 Ky. 218, 3 Bush 218, 1867 Ky. LEXIS 170
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedFebruary 6, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 66 Ky. 218 (Peak v. Percifull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peak v. Percifull, 66 Ky. 218, 3 Bush 218, 1867 Ky. LEXIS 170 (Ky. Ct. App. 1867).

Opinion

JUDGE ROBERTSON

delivered the opinion of the court :

This suit,’being brought to correct errors on the face of the decree, and to perfect the title which it purported to pass, may be considered of the nature of a bill of review. The record shows two such reviewable errors — 1st. In rendering a decree against infants without legal notice or defense; and, 2d. In rendering judgment in favor of Percifull’s administrator without service of process on, or appearance to', his cross-petition as an unsued inter[219]*219venor, and without any order making him a party. It is only when a party defendant files a cross-petition against the party complainant that service of notice of the new and extraneous suit is not necessary. For these errors, it seems to us that the petition shows a good cause for revision and relief by the circuit court, without first appealing to this court.

Wherefore, the judgment, dismissing the petition as ■unsustainable on its face, is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glos v. People
102 N.E. 763 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 Ky. 218, 3 Bush 218, 1867 Ky. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peak-v-percifull-kyctapp-1867.