Peak v. People

71 Ill. 278
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 71 Ill. 278 (Peak v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peak v. People, 71 Ill. 278 (Ill. 1874).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Sheldon

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was a proceeding in bastardy, instituted against Peak, the appellant, in the county court of Scott county, wherein, upon a verdict of guilty, judgment was rendered against Peak. Upon his appeal therefrom to the circuit court of said county, the judgment was affirmed. From that judgment of affirmance by the circuit court, Peak has taken this appeal to this court.

We are of opinion that no appeal lay from the judgment of the county court to the circuit court. We are referred to no statute authorizing such an appeal, and we are unaware of the existence of any such statute.

The “Act to increase the jurisdiction of county courts,” laws of 1871—72, limits the appeals and writs of error which are thereby allowed, in express terms, to cases under that act.

There can be no 'pretense that this is a case under that act, unless it be deemed to fall under the third class of cases therein enumerated, viz : “all criminal cases and misdemeanors, where the punishment is not imprisonment in the penitentiary or death.”

But a prosecution for bastardy has been repeatedly decided by this court to be a civil and not a criminal proceeding. Mann v. The People, 35 Ill. 467; Pease v. Hubbard, 37 id. 257; The People v. Noxon, 40 id. 30; The People v. Starr, 50 id. 52. We do not, then, regard the above act as giving an appeal in such a case as the present.

Jurisdiction to try bastardy cases is not given to the county court by that act, but by another statute. Laws 1871—72, p. 198. This statute gives no right of appeal. Nor does the circumstance that Peak himself took the appeal to the circuit court, affect the question. Consent of parties can not confer jurisdiction upon a court in which the law has not vested it. Ginn et al. v. Rogers, 4 Gilm. 131.

The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, which will leave that of the county co.urt in force.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. Samuelson
92 N.E.2d 343 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1950)
Aetna Plywood & Veneer Co. v. Robineau
83 N.E.2d 896 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1949)
Superior Coal Co. v. O'Brien
50 N.E.2d 453 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1943)
Sanford v. Roberts
236 S.W. 571 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1922)
Sims v. City of Moline
222 Ill. App. 530 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1921)
People v. Industrial Savings Bank
275 Ill. 139 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1916)
People v. Tice
200 Ill. App. 617 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1915)
Matthiessen v. Ott
268 Ill. 569 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1915)
Routt v. Newman
157 Ill. App. 242 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1910)
Ex Parte M.J. Wade
1909 OK CR 38 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1909)
Drainage Commissioners v. Harms
87 N.E. 277 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1909)
Wetzel v. County of Hancock
143 Ill. App. 178 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1907)
Chicago Portrait Co. v. Chicago Crayon Co.
75 N.E. 473 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1905)
Vogel v. People
37 Ill. App. 388 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1890)
People v. Lyons
2 Ill. Cir. Ct. 199 (Illinois Circuit Court, 1884)
Fleischman v. Walker
91 Ill. 318 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 Ill. 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peak-v-people-ill-1874.