Peak v. Howald

30 Kan. 27
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided January 15, 1883·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,:

This proceeding has been irregular from its origin^ and irregular in almost every respect; and the plaintiff having failed to prosecute the proceeding by filing a brief, or otherwise, the proceeding will be dismissed at the plaintiff’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peak v. Howald, 30 Kan. 27 (kan 1883).

30 Kan. 27 (Peak v. Howald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Skinner v. Porter
263 P. 993 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1928)