Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Peak v. Griffitts

Peak v. Griffitts

830 So. 2d 273, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17078, 2002 WL 31538969
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 18, 2002
DocketNo. 1D02-3698
StatusPublished

This text of 830 So. 2d 273 (Peak v. Griffitts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peak v. Griffitts, 830 So. 2d 273, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17078, 2002 WL 31538969 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order, dated October 16, 2002, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The order on appeal, Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Count V, dated August 8, 2002, is neither a final appeal-able order nor an appealable partial final order where an interrelated counterclaim [274]*274for indemnification is pending below. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97, 99-100 (Fla.1974); Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(k), (m).

DISMISSED.

ALLEN, C.J., DAVIS and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SLT Warehouse Company v. Webb
304 So. 2d 97 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
830 So. 2d 273, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17078, 2002 WL 31538969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peak-v-griffitts-fladistctapp-2002.