Peak, Ii (Ronald) v. State
This text of Peak, Ii (Ronald) v. State (Peak, Ii (Ronald) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RONALD DEAN PEAK, II. No. 83852 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. FILED JAN 0 3 2022 ELIZABETH A. BROWN cLEFtyltrr=f2T i DEPUTY P7IERVI'6
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a "motion for order to return seized property." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Cristina D. Silva, Judge. Because no statute or court rule perrnits an appeal from an order denying a motion for an order to return seized property, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 11.33, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Cadish
Pickering Herndon
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(01 I947A .44DP d.2-cvoas cc: Hon. Cristina D. Silva, District Judge Ronald Dean Peak, II Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Peak, Ii (Ronald) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peak-ii-ronald-v-state-nev-2022.