Peagler v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Peagler v. State

159 S.E.2d 72, 223 Ga. 866, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 993

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 4, 1968

Docket24429

StatusPublished

This text of 159 S.E.2d 72 (Peagler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peagler v. State, 159 S.E.2d 72, 223 Ga. 866, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 993 (Ga. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The intervention here raising only legal questions and that the contract involved contravenes the Georgia Constitution (see Peagler v. Ware County Board of Educ., 223 Ga. 734 (157 SE2d 744)), no question involving the constitutionality of a statute or equity is shown to give this court jurisdiction notwithstanding the latest amendment of the Revenue Bond Law (Code Ann. § 87-818; Ga. L. 1966, pp. 48, 50) authorizing appeals under the “procedure provided by law in cases of injunction.” See Dade County v. State of Ga., 201 Ga. 241 (39 SE2d 473).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. Albert E. Butler, for appellant. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Alfred L. Evans, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Arthur Howell, Richard A. Allison, King & Spalding, Robert L. Steed, Peyton Hawes, Jr., Foster Memory, Lewis Slaton, Solicitor General, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The intervention here raising only legal questions and that the contract involved contravenes the Georgia Constitution (see Peagler v. Ware County Board of Educ., 223 Ga. 734 (157 SE2d 744)), no question involving the constitutionality of a statute or equity is shown to give this court jurisdiction notwithstanding the latest amendment of the Revenue Bond Law (Code Ann. § 87-818; Ga. L. 1966, pp. 48, 50) authorizing appeals under the “procedure provided by law in cases of injunction.” See Dade County v. State of Ga., 201 Ga. 241 (39 SE2d 473).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. Albert E. Butler, for appellant. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Alfred L. Evans, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Arthur Howell, Richard A. Allison, King & Spalding, Robert L. Steed, Peyton Hawes, Jr., Foster Memory, Lewis Slaton, Solicitor General, for appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 S.E.2d 72, 223 Ga. 866, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peagler-v-state-ga-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack