Peadon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Peadon v. State

398 So. 2d 485, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19922

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 18, 1981·No. No. VV-476·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s underlying conviction of possession of more than twenty (20) grams of marijuana in violation of Section 893.13(l)(e), Florida Statutes. However, we reverse and remand for resentencing in accordance with Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 1981).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ERVIN, J., and LILES, WOODIE A. (Retired), and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Retired), Associate Judges, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s underlying conviction of possession of more than twenty (20) grams of marijuana in violation of Section 893.13(l)(e), Florida Statutes. However, we reverse and remand for resentencing in accordance with Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 1981).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ERVIN, J., and LILES, WOODIE A. (Retired), and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Retired), Associate Judges, concur.

Peadon v. State, 398 So. 2d 485, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19922 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

398 So. 2d 485 (Peadon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related