Peacon v. Peacon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Peacon v. Peacon

666 So. 2d 567, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 93, 1996 WL 7173

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 10, 1996·No. No. 95-502·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Because the record shows, and we have held in Peacon v. Peacon, 578 So.2d 781 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), review denied, 589 So.2d 292 (Fla.1991), that the former husband made the mortgage payments in discharge of his court ordered child support obligation, he was not entitled to the credit for half of those payments which he was awarded by the trial court. Pastore v. Pastore, 497 So.2d 635 (Fla.1986). Hence that credit is stricken from the judgment under review. The appeal and the cross appeal present no other error.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Because the record shows, and we have held in Peacon v. Peacon, 578 So.2d 781 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), review denied, 589 So.2d 292 (Fla.1991), that the former husband made the mortgage payments in discharge of his court ordered child support obligation, he was not entitled to the credit for half of those payments which he was awarded by the trial court. Pastore v. Pastore, 497 So.2d 635 (Fla.1986). Hence that credit is stricken from the judgment under review. The appeal and the cross appeal present no other error.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Peacon v. Peacon, 666 So. 2d 567, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 93, 1996 WL 7173 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

666 So. 2d 567 (Peacon v. Peacon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related