Peacon v. Peacon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Peacon v. Peacon

666 So. 2d 567, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 93, 1996 WL 7173

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 10, 1996

DocketNo. 95-502

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 666 So. 2d 567 (Peacon v. Peacon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peacon v. Peacon, 666 So. 2d 567, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 93, 1996 WL 7173 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Because the record shows, and we have held in Peacon v. Peacon, 578 So.2d 781 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), review denied, 589 So.2d 292 (Fla.1991), that the former husband made the mortgage payments in discharge of his court ordered child support obligation, he was not entitled to the credit for half of those payments which he was awarded by the trial court. Pastore v. Pastore, 497 So.2d 635 (Fla.1986). Hence that credit is stricken from the judgment under review. The appeal and the cross appeal present no other error.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Because the record shows, and we have held in Peacon v. Peacon, 578 So.2d 781 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), review denied, 589 So.2d 292 (Fla.1991), that the former husband made the mortgage payments in discharge of his court ordered child support obligation, he was not entitled to the credit for half of those payments which he was awarded by the trial court. Pastore v. Pastore, 497 So.2d 635 (Fla.1986). Hence that credit is stricken from the judgment under review. The appeal and the cross appeal present no other error.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

666 So. 2d 567, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 93, 1996 WL 7173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peacon-v-peacon-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack