Peacock v. Thompson

Fourth Circuit

Peacock v. Thompson

86 F. App'x 608

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 5, 2004·No. No. 03-7345·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tryphon Peacock appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Peacock v. Thompson, No. CA-03-567-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 2003). We deny Peacock’s motion for an injunction against administration of medication as it is not related to the present appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Tryphon Peacock appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Peacock v. Thompson, No. CA-03-567-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 2003). We deny Peacock’s motion for an injunction against administration of medication as it is not related to the present appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Peacock v. Thompson, 86 F. App'x 608 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

86 F. App'x 608 (Peacock v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related