Peacock v. State

362 So. 2d 174, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16611
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 15, 1978·No. No. KK-136·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a criminal conviction for withholding support for a minor child. We reverse.

In the trial court there was no showing of the defendant’s ability or capacity to provide support and there was no showing of the needs of the minor child. Thus, the essential factors set forth in Stedman v. State, 80 Fla. 547, 86 So. 428 (1920), were not established.

REVERSED with orders that appellant be discharged.

McCORD, C. J., and MILLS and BOYER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peacock v. State, 362 So. 2d 174, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16611 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

362 So. 2d 174 (Peacock v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Collins v. Newton
362 So. 2d 174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)