Peacock v. Reinecke

Supreme Court

Peacock v. Reinecke

271 U.S. 643, 46 S. Ct. 481

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 26, 1926

DocketNo. 266

StatusPublished

This text of 271 U.S. 643 (Peacock v. Reinecke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peacock v. Reinecke, 271 U.S. 643, 46 S. Ct. 481 (1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want, of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Toop v. Ulysses Land Company, 237 U. S. 580, 583; United Security Company v. American Fruit Produce Company, 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v, United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184; Berkman v. United States, 250 U. S. 114, 118; Piedmont Power & Light Com[644]*644pany v. Town of Graham, 263 U. S. 193, 195.

Mr. Herbert Pope, with whom Messrs. James F. Forstall and E. Barrett Prettyman were on the brief, for appellant. Solicitor General Mitchell, with whom Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt and Mr. Sewall Key were on the brief, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want, of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Toop v. Ulysses Land Company, 237 U. S. 580, 583; United Security Company v. American Fruit Produce Company, 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v, United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184; Berkman v. United States, 250 U. S. 114, 118; Piedmont Power & Light Com[644]*644pany v. Town of Graham, 263 U. S. 193, 195.

Mr. Herbert Pope, with whom Messrs. James F. Forstall and E. Barrett Prettyman were on the brief, for appellant. Solicitor General Mitchell, with whom Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt and Mr. Sewall Key were on the brief, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 U.S. 643, 46 S. Ct. 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peacock-v-reinecke-scotus-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack