Peacock v. O'Hara

114 So. 384, 94 Fla. 672
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 19, 1927·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen *673 and inspected, and tbe Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree. The evidence having been heard by the chancellor in person, and there being ample evidence to support his conclusions, it is considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. ■

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peacock v. O'Hara, 114 So. 384, 94 Fla. 672 (Fla. 1927).

114 So. 384 (Peacock v. O'Hara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.