Peacock v. Frederick

170 So. 129, 125 Fla. 414, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1299
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 12, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 170 So. 129 (Peacock v. Frederick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peacock v. Frederick, 170 So. 129, 125 Fla. 414, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1299 (Fla. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— Return to the rule nisi in prohibition having been made and it appearing therefrom that petitioner has duly pursued the procedure provided for in Section 4341 C. G. L.,'2674 R. G. S., for the disqualification of respondent to act as Judge in the cause described in the rule nisi heretofore issued, it is thereupon ordered, on authority of Dickenson v. Parks, 104 Fla. 577, 140 Sou. Rep. 459, text page 462, that the writ of prohibition absolute prohibiting the respondent H. B. Frederick, as Judge of the Circuit Court of the Seventh Judicial Circuit in and for Volusia County, from further acting or making any order or decree other than an order of disqualification in the cause referred to and described in'the rule nisi heretofore issued in this proceeding, be granted.

Prohibition awarded.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scussel v. Kelly
152 So. 2d 767 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 So. 129, 125 Fla. 414, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peacock-v-frederick-fla-1936.