Peacock v. City of Rochester
This text of 175 A.D.2d 628 (Peacock v. City of Rochester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff was injured while ice skating at Manhattan Square Park and has alleged that her injuries resulted from defendant’s negligent supervision of a potentially dangerous activity. Defendant has failed to establish as a matter of law that its supervision could not have been negligent (see, Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065; Noeller v County of Erie, 145 AD2d 919). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Willis, J.— [629]*629Summary Judgment.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 A.D.2d 628, 573 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peacock-v-city-of-rochester-nyappdiv-1991.