Peacock v. City of Miami

133 So. 549, 101 Fla. 140
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 6, 1931·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In this case Mr. Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Davis are of opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be affirmed while Mr. Chief Justice Buford and Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Ellis are of opinion that the decree should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court are sitting sis members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Bueord, C.J., and Whiteield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peacock v. City of Miami, 133 So. 549, 101 Fla. 140 (Fla. 1931).

133 So. 549 (Peacock v. City of Miami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)
Griffith v. Alcocke
37 So. 47 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1904)