Peacock v. Burlington County Historical Society
234 A.2d 399, 50 N.J. 290
Opinion
HELEN N. PEACOCK, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS,
v.
BURLINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Messrs. Novogrod, Sugarman & Introcaso for the petitioners.
Messrs. Sutton, Ward, Sutton & Heim and Mr. David P. Loughran for the respondent.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peacock v. Burlington County Historical Society, 234 A.2d 399, 50 N.J. 290 (N.J. 1967).
234 A.2d 399 (Peacock v. Burlington County Historical Society) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J. D. Construction Corp. v. Isaacs
239 A.2d 657 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1968)