Peacock v. Burlington County Historical Society
234 A.2d 399, 50 N.J. 290
This text of 234 A.2d 399 (Peacock v. Burlington County Historical Society) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Peacock v. Burlington County Historical Society, 234 A.2d 399, 50 N.J. 290 (N.J. 1967).
Opinion
HELEN N. PEACOCK, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS,
v.
BURLINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Messrs. Novogrod, Sugarman & Introcaso for the petitioners.
Messrs. Sutton, Ward, Sutton & Heim and Mr. David P. Loughran for the respondent.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
J. D. Construction Corp. v. Isaacs
239 A.2d 657 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1968)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
234 A.2d 399, 50 N.J. 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peacock-v-burlington-county-historical-society-nj-1967.