Peachtree Gun Club v. Trimble
This text of 186 S.E. 669 (Peachtree Gun Club v. Trimble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where in a lease it was stipulated that the lessee might, remove any of the improvements put on the place during the term of the lease, and a party who held the title to the lot of land in question, under a security deed that was prior in date to the lease, had notice that the stipulation for making and removing the improvements was in the lease, and consented thereto, such improvements might be removed, and the holder of the security deed was not entitled to injunction to prevent the removal, although his consent to the stipulation in the lease as to making and removing the improvements was not in [631]*631writing. His consent to the part of the lease permitting the removal would estop him from objecting thereto.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 S.E. 669, 182 Ga. 630, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peachtree-gun-club-v-trimble-ga-1936.