Peachey v. Dade County

193 So. 2d 166, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3187
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 23, 1966
DocketNo. 35154
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 So. 2d 166 (Peachey v. Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peachey v. Dade County, 193 So. 2d 166, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3187 (Fla. 1966).

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon consideration of the petition we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the petition is denied and the writ discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, CALDWELL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur. DREW, J., dissents with Opinion. ROBERTS and ERVIN, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Donald Lacy v. Wesley Cox
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2003

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 So. 2d 166, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peachey-v-dade-county-fla-1966.