Peachey v. Dade County

Supreme Court of Florida

Peachey v. Dade County

193 So. 2d 166, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3187

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 23, 1966·No. No. 35154·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon consideration of the petition we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the petition is denied and the writ discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, CALDWELL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur. DREW, J., dissents with Opinion. ROBERTS and ERVIN, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon consideration of the petition we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the petition is denied and the writ discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, CALDWELL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur. DREW, J., dissents with Opinion. ROBERTS and ERVIN, JJ., dissent.

Peachey v. Dade County, 193 So. 2d 166, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3187 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

193 So. 2d 166 (Peachey v. Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related