PEACHER v. CONYERS

District Court, S.D. Indiana·Decided December 3, 2020·No. 1:20-cv-02997·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

R. PEACHER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:20-cv-02997-JPH-DML ) MARTIAL KNIESER, ) MICHAEL CONYERS, ) HAROLD COUNCELLOR, ) MATTHEW VANDINE, ) ) Defendants. )

ENTRY GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND MOTION TO AMEND

I.

The plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. [3], is granted. The assessment of even an initial partial filing fee is waived because the plaintiff has no assets and no means by which to pay a partial filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). Accordingly, no initial partial filing fee is due at this time. Notwithstanding the foregoing ruling, “[a]ll [28 U.S.C.] § 1915 has ever done is excuse pre-payment of the docket fees; a litigant remains liable for them, and for other costs, although poverty may make collection impossible.” Abdul-Wadood v. Nathan, 91 F.3d 1023, 1025 (7th Cir. 1996). II. The plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint, dkt. [8], is granted. The clerk is directed to re-docket the amended complaint tendered at dkt. 8-1. The amended complaint filed on November 19, 2020, is the operative pleading in this action. The Court will screen the amended complaint in accordance with 28 U.S.C.$ 1915A ina separate, future Entry. SO ORDERED. Date: 12/3/2020 Sjamu Patrick hawlove James Patrick Hanlon United States District Judge Southern District of Indiana

Distribution: R. PEACHER 881627 PENDLETON - CF PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY Electronic Service Participant — Court Only

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEACHER v. CONYERS, (S.D. Ind. 2020).

PEACHER v. CONYERS (PEACHER v. CONYERS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related